Lobbying Transparency · Comparative Analysis
How 30+ Jurisdictions Are Rewriting the Rules of Influence — From Handshakes to Hashtags
The global architecture of lobbying transparency has undergone an unprecedented transformation in the first quarter of the 21st century. What was once a niche concern for a handful of North American jurisdictions has evolved into a centerpiece of international integrity standards. As public trust in democratic institutions remains under strain — the 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index records stagnation or decline in over two-thirds of nations — the regulation of influence has become a critical mechanism for safeguarding the legitimacy of policy-making.1
The OECD responded to this shifting landscape by revising its Recommendation on Principles for Transparency and Integrity in Lobbying in May 2024. The revision marks a fundamental pivot: influence is no longer confined to traditional “handshakes” but has migrated to digital “hashtags,” pushing regulators to encompass social-media campaigns, AI-driven advocacy and the complex web of foreign-funded interests.3
Lobbying — communication by or on behalf of an organised interest group intended to influence public decisions — remains an essential component of the democratic “contest of ideas”.5 But the systemic imbalance between well-resourced commercial interests and broader civil society distorts that contest, and governments worldwide have answered with transparency registries clustered by legal robustness, geographic proximity and political tradition. This guide compares the leading regimes side by side.
Public trust
2/3
Nations stagnating or declining
Share of countries in the 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index showing flat or worsening integrity scores.
EU register
12,000+
Organisations tracked
Entities listed in the EU Transparency Register — a de facto mandatory regime gating high-level meetings.
Canada threshold
8h
The new bar for registration
As of 19 Jan 2026 Canada lowers its threshold from 20% of duties to just eight hours of collective lobbying per four-week period.
Framework
How to Compare Lobbying Transparency Regimes
Comparing international lobbying registries requires a standardised framework that transcends legal terminology. Academic and civil-society researchers have built several benchmarking indices to evaluate effectiveness. One of the most comprehensive is the Framework fOr Comprehensive and Accessible Lobbying (FOCAL), spanning eight primary categories: scope, timeliness, openness, descriptors, revolving door, relationships, financials and contact logs.7 It allows a nuanced assessment of whether a register is a mere administrative list or a functional tool for public accountability.
A secondary metric is the “Hired Guns” index, originally developed by the Center for Public Integrity, which scores transparency, accountability and enforcement across diverse jurisdictions and tracks evolution over time.8 The Good Lobby Tracker adds a multi-dimensional read on corporate reporting — noting a modest 5% recent uplift in scores, but significant remaining gaps in how corporations disclose their political footprints.9
| Comparative Dimension | Key Indicators & Requirements | Global Best Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Scope of Coverage | Range of lobbyists (consultant vs in-house) and public officials (executive, legislative, staff) | All individuals/entities influencing any government branch |
| Reporting Timeliness | Frequency of updates (monthly, quarterly, annual) and filing deadlines | Real-time or monthly reporting of specific communications |
| Financial Disclosure | Requirements for spending, client fees and political donations | Granular disclosure of expenditure ranges and funding sources |
| Activity Descriptors | Specificity of legislative files, policy areas and intended outcomes | Linking every meeting to a specific bill, regulation or contract |
| Integrity Measures | Code of conduct, revolving-door restrictions, cooling-off periods | Mandatory 2–5 year cooling-off periods for senior officials |
| Oversight & Enforcement | Independent oversight body with audit and sanctioning powers | Independent Commissioner empowered to fine or prosecute |
Global Map
Global Lobbying Transparency Registries at a Glance
The table below compares active and emerging lobbying registries across six continents, including official access portals where available.
| Region | Jurisdiction | Primary Law / Scheme | Registry Type | Oversight Body | Registry URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. America | Canada (Fed) | Lobbying Act11 | Mandatory | Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying (OCL) | lobbycanada.gc.ca |
| USA (Fed) | Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA)13 | Mandatory | Secretary of Senate / Clerk of House | lobbyingdisclosure.house.gov | |
| USA (Fed) | Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) | Mandatory | Department of Justice (DOJ) | fara.gov | |
| Europe | European Union | Interinstitutional Agreement15 | Mandatory (de facto) | Joint Secretariat | transparency-register.europa.eu |
| France | Loi Sapin II15 | Mandatory | HATVP | hatvp.fr | |
| Germany | Lobbyregistergesetz (LobbyRG)13 | Mandatory | President of the Bundestag | bundestag.de/lobbyregister | |
| United Kingdom | Transparency of Lobbying Act 201416 | Mandatory (consultants) | Registrar of Consultant Lobbyists | registrarofconsultantlobbyists.org.uk | |
| Austria | LobbyG4 | Mandatory | Ministry of Justice | lobbyreg.justiz.gv.at | |
| Ireland | Regulation of Lobbying Act 201518 | Mandatory | Standards in Public Office Commission | lobbying.ie | |
| Greece | Law 4829/20217 | Mandatory | National Transparency Authority | gov.gr/en/arxes/ethnike-arkhe-diaphaneias | |
| Lithuania | Law on Lobbying Activities4 | Mandatory | Chief Official Ethics Commission | vtek.lt | |
| Portugal | Lobbying Law 5-A/202620 | Mandatory | Portuguese Parliament (RTRI) | parlamento.pt | |
| Albania | Law 12/202621 | Mandatory | Commissioner for Lobbying | N/A (administered by Commissioner) | |
| Czechia | Lobbying Act (eff. 2025)7 | Mandatory | Ministry of Justice | relob.gov.cz | |
| Ukraine | Lobbying Law (2024)22 | Mandatory | NACP | nazk.gov.ua | |
| Finland | Transparency Register Act (2023)22 | Mandatory | National Audit Office | N/A (administered by VTV)15 | |
| S. America | Chile | Law 20.730 (Lobby Law) | Mandatory (agenda) | Commission for Transparency | lobby.gob.cl |
| Peru | Law 28024 | Mandatory (logs) | Individual Public Entities | Distributed (entity websites)23 | |
| Brazil | Bill 4391/2021 | Pending | Proposed: CGU | Pending legislation36 | |
| Asia-Pacific | Taiwan | Lobbying Act (2008) | Mandatory | Ministry of the Interior | moi.gov.tw |
| Australia (Fed) | Lobbying Code of Conduct24 | Code-based | Attorney-General’s Department | ag.gov.au/integrity/lobbyists | |
| Australia (Fed) | FITS Act (2018)24 | Mandatory (foreign) | Attorney-General’s Department | ag.gov.au/fits | |
| Israel | Knesset Law (2008)26 | Mandatory (Knesset) | Knesset Speaker’s Committee | main.knesset.gov.il | |
| Africa | South Africa | Ethics Acts (no formal register) | Self-regulatory | Joint Committee on Ethics | N/A (self-regulatory)46 |
| Nigeria | Lobbying Disclosure Bill | Pending | Proposed: Ministry of Justice | Pending legislation51 |
North America
Progenitors of Mandatory Disclosure
The North American cluster maintains the world’s most rigorous and established lobbying transparency systems. Both Canada and the United States have moved beyond the “sunshine principles” of the late 20th century to implement high-frequency reporting regimes that emphasise the demand side of influence.11
The Canadian Federal Regime: The 8-Hour Shift
Canada’s federal lobbying framework, administered by the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying (OCL), is characterised by its high volume of data and strict reporting timelines. The Lobbying Act distinguishes between consultant lobbyists — paid to represent a client — and in-house lobbyists employed by corporations or organisations.11 The 2024–25 fiscal year saw record activity, with active registrations consistently above 6,000 and peaking at 6,223 in November 2024.11
A transformative shift is now under way. Historically, organisations were required to register only if lobbying constituted a “significant part of duties” (roughly 20% of an employee’s time). As of 19 January 2026 a new interpretation lowers the threshold to just eight hours of collective lobbying activity by one or more employees in any four-week period.28 The change is projected to bring thousands of previously exempt businesses and non-profits under federal oversight — a recognition that influence is increasingly cumulative and fragmented across multiple staff rather than concentrated in a single professional lobbyist.28
| Canadian OCL Metrics | 2023–24 Actuals | 2024–25 Actuals | 2025–26 Forecast |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total communication reports | 34,490 (all-time record) | 34,000+ (second highest) | Expected growth |
| Active registrations | ~5,800 | 6,223 (Nov 2024 peak) | Increase due to 8-hour rule |
| Active lobbyists | ~7,000 | 7,421 (Jan 2025 peak) | Projected >8,500 |
| Compliance (timely filing) | 93.4% | 92.5% | Target >95% |
| Oversight budget | $5.8M | $6.1M | $6.3M |
The Canadian model’s monthly communication reports are its most potent feature. Registrants must disclose oral and pre-arranged communications with Designated Public Office Holders (DPOHs) by the 15th of the following month.11 That granularity lets the public track the exact timing of interactions relative to legislative milestones, such as the April 2025 federal election cycle that significantly shaped advocacy activity.11
The United States: Federal Fragmentation and Foreign Agency
The United States federal system is split between the Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) of 1995 and the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). The LDA requires quarterly reports on lobbying activities and semi-annual reports on political contributions.13 While the US registry is processable and allows extensive data analysis, it suffers from the “20% loophole”: individuals who spend less than one-fifth of their time on lobbying for a specific client are not required to register.14 Roughly 13,000 lobbyists are estimated to be active while only ~4,000 are formally registered — a gap academic observers call “shadow lobbying”.13
FARA serves a different, more security-oriented purpose: it requires individuals acting as “agents of foreign principals” to disclose their relationships, activities and finances. In 2025 policy discussions in Congress shifted toward prohibiting compensation for lobbying on behalf of countries designated as Countries of Particular Concern (CPC), such as those with severe religious-freedom violations.30 The trend is unmistakable: lobbying transparency is being subsumed into broader national-security and human-rights frameworks.30
Europe
A Diverse Mosaic of Mandatory and Voluntary Systems
Europe is the most complex continental cluster, with a clear trend toward mandatory statutory regulation being countered by a historical reliance on voluntary association lists in some jurisdictions.15
The European Union Transparency Register
The EU Transparency Register, jointly operated by the European Parliament, the Commission and the Council, is a de facto mandatory system. The underlying legal basis remains an Interinstitutional Agreement rather than hard law, but registration is a prerequisite for high-level meetings, access badges and participation in expert groups.15 It tracks over 12,000 organisations.15 A signal from recent corporate disclosures — for instance Sanofi/Opella in 2024 — is the rise of “responsible lobbying” procedures aligning internal corporate governance with EU expectations, often disclosing trade-association membership fees even when not strictly required by the letter of the law.31
National Case Studies: France, Germany and the UK
The French Sapin II law of 2016 remains the most robust national model in Europe. Managed by the High Authority for the Transparency of Public Life (HATVP), it requires any organisation to register if its “principal or regular activity” involves influencing government decisions.15 Unlike the famously narrow UK model, France covers both consultants and in-house lobbyists, requiring disclosure of identity, expenditures and the level of the official contacted.15
Germany’s 2022 Lobby Register Act marked a paradigm shift from the previous “list of associations” to a mandatory registry with a formal code of conduct.13 The change was driven by a series of scandals that exposed the inadequacy of voluntary disclosure. The register now requires information on the lobbyist’s board composition, membership count and financial resources, with sanctions including the loss of the right to be heard in parliamentary committees.15
The United Kingdom’s system, overseen by the Registrar of Consultant Lobbyists, continues to draw fire from transparency advocates. The 2014 Act requires registration only for third-party consultants interacting with Ministers or Permanent Secretaries.13 For the 2024–25 fiscal year, the Registrar’s primary objective was enforcing Quarterly Information Returns (QIRs) and monitoring compliance following the general election.16 The exclusion of in-house lobbyists leaves the vast majority of corporate influence outside the statutory register — a structural gap critics argue undermines the system’s effectiveness.13
The Mediterranean and Eastern Frontiers
Several states have moved to address lightly regulated environments. Greece established a mandatory transparency register in 2021, requiring “interest representatives” to register before engaging in influential activities.32 Czechia rejected several voluntary proposals before passing a new law effective in 2025, establishing a publicly available registry of lobbyists targeting both legislative and executive bodies.32 These developments reflect a regional convergence toward the OECD standards even where lobbying was traditionally unregulated.33
South America
The “Transparency of the Agenda” Model
South America has developed an innovative approach to lobbying transparency that focuses on the demand side — the public officials being lobbied — rather than just the supply side.34
Chile and Peru: Real-Time Open Data
Chile’s Law 20.730 (the Lobbying Act) is the regional benchmark. Instead of a traditional lobbyist register, it mandates that public authorities publish their daily agendas, including all meetings with lobbyists, details of travel and any donations or gifts received.34 The information is published through a centralised “Open Lobbying Data” portal, providing a high level of accountability for the behaviour of elected officials.26
Peru’s Law 28024 (2003) similarly requires public entities to keep electronic visit logs recording every person who attends a meeting with a public official, with information published clearly on the agency’s website.23 The model is particularly effective in high-corruption environments because it eliminates the lobbyist’s ability to “hide” by not registering — the burden of transparency is placed on the state institution itself.35
Brazil: The Digital Battlefield
Brazil is at a pivotal moment in its integrity landscape. Bill 4391/2021, authored by Deputy Carlos Zarattini, seeks to finally regulate lobbying and bring Brazil in line with OECD standards.36 Today lobbying in Brazil is often equated with criminal practices such as “influence peddling” due to the lack of formal rules.36 The urgency was made stark by the 2024–25 “Fake News Bill” (PL 2630) and “Digital Child Protection Law” (PL 2628), where Big Tech firms including Google, Meta and Twitter were accused of using aggressive, non-transparent lobbying to influence legislative outcomes.37 The OECD’s 2025 Integrity Review of Brazil emphasises that a clear framework for lobbying and political finance is essential to prevent “policy capture”.20
Oceania & Asia
Targeted and Legislated Influences
In the Oceania-Asia cluster, lobbying regulation often combines traditional administrative registers with specific legislation aimed at foreign-state influence.
Australia: The Register vs FITS
Australia maintains two parallel systems at the federal level. The Australian Government Register of Lobbyists, administered by the Attorney-General’s Department, is a non-legislated scheme based on a Code of Conduct.10 It covers only third-party consultant lobbyists, and government representatives are strictly prohibited from meeting with any consultant who is not on the register.38
The Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme (FITS), introduced in 2018, is a statutory requirement for anyone undertaking activities on behalf of a “foreign principal”.10 FITS is much broader in scope than the lobbyist register, covering any activity intended to influence a government or political process.25 The dual-track reveals a second-order trend: while domestic “commercial” lobbying is handled with a light-touch administrative code, foreign-aligned influence is treated as a national-security matter with criminal penalties.25
Israel and Taiwan: Specific Geographic and Procedural Limits
Israel’s lobbying rules are strictly confined to the Knesset. The 2008 Knesset Law requires professional lobbyists to wear identification tags and obtain permits from a committee chaired by the Speaker.41 A major limitation is the geographic and institutional focus: it does not regulate lobbying of the executive branch or government agencies, where roughly 70% of lobbying activity actually occurs.42
Taiwan’s 2008 Lobbying Act is more comprehensive, covering both the legislature and executive.43 It requires lobbyists to register on a case-by-case basis before commencing any activities, and lobbied agencies must notify their affiliated departments within seven days of any lobbying contact, publishing the records quarterly.43
Africa
Ethical Frameworks and Emerging Standards
Lobbying regulation in Africa is currently characterised by “soft” ethical codes for public officials rather than mandatory registers for lobbyists — though there are signs of legislative movement in several key economies.
South Africa: The Ethics and Disclosure Paradigm
South Africa has no formal lobbying register. Instead, it relies on the Executive Members’ Ethics Act of 1998 and the Code of Ethical Conduct for Members of Parliament.21 MPs are prohibited from lobbying for remuneration and must disclose all gifts, hospitality and financial interests over R3,000 in a public register.45 This provides transparency over benefits received by politicians, but does not record the thousands of interactions with lobbyists that occur annually.45 Following the “state capture” era, researchers have noted an “immediate need” to recognise lobbying as a profession and introduce formal regulation.46
Kenya: Sectoral Transparency and New Bills
Kenya’s legislative focus for 2024–25 has been on sector-specific transparency. The Local Content Bill, 2025 and the Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASP) Bill, 2025 both include significant disclosure and licensing requirements for foreign firms.47 While Kenya has not yet passed a general lobbying act, the VASP Bill in particular mandates transparency in pricing, risk disclosure and the establishment of a physical office in Kenya for any entity seeking to influence the digital financial sector.12 The National Digital Economy and e-Governance Bill 2025 also represents a major step toward institutionalising digital governance, likely including more formalised channels for stakeholder engagement.27
Enforcement
Comparative Analysis of Global Enforcement and Sanctions
The effectiveness of any lobbying registry is fundamentally tied to its enforcement mechanism. Without meaningful sanctions, registers risk becoming “paper tigers” that only capture those who choose to be transparent.
| Country / Region | Oversight Body | Maximum Sanctions | Enforcement Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canada | Commissioner of Lobbying | $200,000 fine / 2 years prison | High: active monthly monitoring and audits |
| United States | Secretary of Senate / House | Civil and criminal penalties | Low: high theoretical penalties, low actual action |
| France | HATVP | Fines and professional bans | Moderate: systematic monitoring of Sapin II |
| Australia | Attorney-General’s Dept | Removal from register | Light-touch: focus on de-registration |
| European Union | Joint Secretariat | Removal from register | Administrative: loss of meeting rights / badges |
| Austria | Ministry of Justice | €60,000 fine | Statutory: administrative penalties for non-compliance |
Many jurisdictions have stringent disclosure requirements but lack the investigative resources to verify the accuracy of filings — only a small fraction of OECD countries have carried out at least one non-compliance investigation in the latest calendar year.48
The global average for “Hired Guns” scores has remained stagnant. The pattern is consistent: powerful sanctions on paper, low actual enforcement — making the verifiability of filings, not their existence, the bottleneck for the next decade of reform.8
Future Trends
Three Forces Reshaping the Next Generation of Registers
As the influence landscape evolves, three critical trends will define the next generation of lobbying registers.
Trend 01
Digitalisation & AI-driven advocacy
The OECD’s 2024 shift from “handshakes to hashtags” is the most significant challenge for current registers.4 Interest groups now organise grassroots campaigns and shape public opinion through social media at a fraction of the cost of traditional lobbying. Future registers will need to capture digital footprints — social-media algorithms, AI agents and funding for academic or grassroots front groups.3
Trend 02
Foreign-influence registries
National security is becoming the engine for transparency. Australia’s FITS and proposed FARA reforms in the US indicate governments are more concerned with who funds the lobbyist than who they meet.30 Expect dual-track systems imposing higher disclosure burdens on foreign-funded entities to proliferate.25
Trend 03
The 8-hour threshold
Canada’s 2026 threshold change reflects a deeper realisation: influence is no longer a full-time profession for the few but a part-time task for many.28 Capturing collective organisational time prevents the “fragmentation of influence” where firms avoid registration by splitting duties across staff.28
Recommendations
Strategic Recommendations
There is no single “correct” model for lobbying transparency, but a spectrum of effectiveness. The North American mandatory statutory model provides the most data, while the South American agenda-disclosure model provides the most accountability for public officials.11 Three roles, three priorities:
Adopt internal “Global Procedures on Responsible Lobbying”, similar to those practised by Sanofi/Opella, to ensure compliance across divergent continental rules.31 Track not just direct meetings but also contributions to trade associations and think tanks.9
The 2024 OECD Recommendations provide a blueprint for modernising registers. Priority: close the in-house loophole, impose mandatory cooling-off periods for public officials, and ensure registry data is open and processable for third-party analysis.3
Shift the focus from the mere existence of a register to the quality of its data. “Legislative footprints” — linking specific lobbying activities to specific outcomes — remain the holy grail of transparency and should be the primary advocacy goal for the next decade of reforms.3
Conclusion
From Sunshine Principles to Decision-Ready Intelligence
The goal of these registries is not to prohibit influence, but to ensure it is exercised in the light of day. As the 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index makes clear, the price of secrecy is a persistent decline in public trust.1
Only by making the contest of ideas truly visible — across handshakes and hashtags, across 30+ jurisdictions and their increasingly divergent disclosure regimes — can governments restore the integrity of the public decision-making process.
Ready to track global lobbying transparency in real time?
Policy-Insider.AI consolidates lobbying registers, parliamentary records and stakeholder narratives across 30+ jurisdictions — turning fragmented disclosures into a single, decision-ready intelligence layer.
Start a free pilot →No credit card required · Set up in minutes
Sources
References
- Corruption Perceptions Index 2025 — Transparency.org. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2025
- Corruption Perceptions Index 2024 — Transparency.org. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2024
- Recommendation of the Council on Transparency and Integrity in Lobbying and Influence — OECD Legal Instruments. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/public/doc/256/256.en.pdf
- Lobbying — OECD. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/lobbying.html
- Lobby Transparency Across the EU — Transparency International EU. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://transparency.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Transparency-international-EU_briefing_Lobby-transparency-in-the-EU.pdf
- Submission to the inquiry into lobbying access and oversight — Grattan Institute. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Submission-to-the-inquiry-into-lobbying-access-and-oversight-2024.pdf
- Lobbying in the Sunlight: A Scoping Review of Frameworks to Measure the Accessibility of Lobbying Disclosures — PMC. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11549566/
- Comparing the Evolution of Lobbying Legislation in Lithuania and Ireland: Whither Regulatory Robustness? Accessed 14 May 2026, https://administrativescience.com/index.php/instadm/article/view/148/106
- The Good Lobby Tracker Report 2025. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.thegoodlobby.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/The-Good-Lobby-Tracker-Report-2025-3.pdf
- Lobbying regulation and reform: current and future directions — Parliament of Australia. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_departments/Parliamentary_Library/Research/Policy_Briefs/2025-26/Lobbyingregulationandreform
- Annual Report 2024–25 — Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/en/reports-and-publications/annual-report-2024-25/
- Kenya’s VASP Bill 2025: Digital Finance — Njaga & Co. Advocates LLP. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://njagaadvocates.com/kenyas-vasp-bill-2025-regulating-crypto-protecting-investors-and-transforming-digital-finance/
- Lobby register — Wikipedia. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobby_register
- Lobbying — Wikipedia. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobbying
- Transparency of lobbying in Member States and the UK — European Parliament. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/EPRS/Lobbying-transparency-comparative-analysis-rev-FINAL.pdf
- Annual Report and Accounts 2024 to 2025 — Office of the Registrar of Consultant Lobbyists. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://registrarofconsultantlobbyists.org.uk/annual-report-and-accounts-2024-to-2025/
- November 2021 Update to Brazil’s Regulatory Framework. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/2021/12/01/november-2021-update-to-brazils-regulatory-framework
- New Federal Lobbying Registry Rules Might Consider You a Lobbyist — CFIB. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.cfib-fcei.ca/en/tools-resources/lobbying-act
- Code of Ethical Conduct and Disclosure of Members’ Interests — Parliament of South Africa. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.parliament.gov.za/storage/app/media/Ethics/Code%20of%20Ethical%20Conduct/Code_of_Ethical_conduct_V2.pdf
- Strengthening Transparency and Integrity in Decision-Making in Brazil — OECD Integrity Review of Brazil 2025. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-integrity-review-of-brazil-2025_cfcce75d-en/full-report/strengthening-transparency-and-integrity-in-decision-making-in-brazil_45fceea8.html
- Fazela Mohamed Legacy Report on the Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://pmg.org.za/6th-parliament-review/articles/fazela-mohamed
- Lobbying: Anti-Corruption and Integrity Outlook 2026 — OECD. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/anti-corruption-and-integrity-outlook-2026_16708b78-en/full-report/component-6.html
- Lobbying in Peru — Association of Accredited Public Policy Advocates to the European Union. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.aalep.eu/lobbying-peru
- Comparative Study of Lobbying Regulation Mechanisms — HATVP. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.hatvp.fr/english_news/comparative-study-of-lobbying-regulation-mechanisms/
- Foreign Influence Laws Compared: Australia and Israel — FARA.us. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.fara.us/foreign-influence-laws-in-australia-and-israel
- Individual Chapters (OGG) — Open Government Partnership. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Open-Gov-Guide-2024-Lobbying.pdf
- Public Hearing on National Digital Economy and e-Governance Bill 2025 — FMCIDE. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://fmcide.gov.ng/public-hearing-on-national-digital-economy-and-e-governance-bill-2025-holds-in-abuja/
- Surge in Federal Lobbying Registrations Projected with Lowered Registration Threshold — Gowling WLG. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://gowlingwlg.com/en/insights-resources/articles/2026/surge-in-federal-lobbying-registrations-projected
- Departmental Plan 2025–26 — Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/en/reports-and-publications/departmental-plan-2025-26/
- Congress Should Ban Lobbying by CPC Countries that Violate FoRB — USCIRF. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.uscirf.gov/news-room/releases-statements/congress-should-ban-lobbying-cpc-countries-violate-forb
- Transparency for Public Affairs Activities — Lobbying 2024, Opella. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.opella.com/dam/jcr:53d883c5-890f-4e72-85d0-38163e0b9561/EU%20Transparency%20Register%20Reporting%202025%20(FY%202024)_Sanofi%20CHC%20vF.pdf
- Lobbying and Foreign Agent Registration Laws — Library of Congress. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/llglrd/2023555923/2023555923.pdf
- More Governments Introduce Lobbying Regulations — Statista. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.statista.com/chart/36006/timeline-of-countries-that-have-adopted-regulatory-frameworks-on-lobbying-activities-1989-2025/
- Case Study: Lobbying Regulation in Chile — Opening Access to Authorities. Accessed 14 May 2026, http://sociedadpoliticaspublicas.cl/archivos/octavo/gestiondeestado/GESTION_Sahd_Jorge.pdf
- Co-Creation Meeting: International Standards for Lobbying Regulation — ParlAmericas. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://parlamericas.org/uploads/documents/Report_lobby_OPN_Lima_ENG.pdf
- A Discussion on the Regulation of the “Lobby” in Brazil — Análise Editorial. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://en.analise.com/opiniao/uma-discussao-sobre-a-regulamentacao-do-lobby-no-brasil
- Brazil: Big Tech Cries “Censorship” and Spreads Disinformation — SOMO. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.somo.nl/brazil-big-tech-cries-censorship-and-spreads-disinformation/
- Information for Lobbyists — Attorney-General’s Department. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.ag.gov.au/integrity/australian-government-register-lobbyists/information-lobbyists
- Australian Government Register of Lobbyists — Attorney-General’s Department. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.ag.gov.au/integrity/australian-government-register-lobbyists
- Chapter 3 — Current Regulatory Arrangements for Lobbyists in Australia and Internationally. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Finance_and_Public_Administration/LobbyistsAccessAPH47/Report/Chapter_3_-_Current_regulatory_arrangements_for_lobbyists_in_Australia_and_internationally
- Lobbyists (Interest Groups) — Knesset. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://main.knesset.gov.il/EN/About/Lexicon/Pages/lobbyist.aspx
- Unclassified — GOV.UK. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7e2a6340f0b62302689972/A-D.pdf
- Lobbying in Taiwan — Association of Accredited Public Policy Advocates to the European Union. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.aalep.eu/lobbying-taiwan
- Lobbying — Sunshine Acts. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://sunshine.cy.gov.tw/en/cp.aspx?n=44
- Ethics in Practice: Gifts, Benefits and Hospitality — What MPs May and May Not Accept. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.pa.org.za/blog/ethics-in-practice-gifts-benefits-and-hospitality
- Mokgano Leshalabe — Regulating Unethical Political and Business Lobbying, University of Pretoria. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstreams/7ad3df45-489f-4e93-9d28-cbdf70fa6a66/download
- Kenya’s Draft Local Content Bill 2025: A Legal Analysis for Policy Makers and Investors. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://globallawexperts.com/kenyas-draft-local-content-bill-2025-a-legal-analysis-for-policy-makers-and-investors/
- United States — OECD Public Integrity Indicators. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://oecd-public-integrity-indicators.org/countries/usa/indicators/1000097/
- How to Evaluate a Foreign Influence Legislation? A Comparative Analysis — The Good Lobby. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://thegoodlobby.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Study-How-to-Evaluate-a-Foreign-Influence-Legislation-A-Comparative-Analysis.pdf
- Mapping and Analysing Lobbying Registers — Diva-Portal.org. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1904976/FULLTEXT01.pdf
- Lobbying Disclosure Act Amendment Bill Scales Second Reading in the Senate. Accessed 14 May 2026, https://placng.org/i/lobbying-disclosure-act-amendment-bill-scales-second-reading-in-the-senate/